Holiday Ruiners – Lousy Marketers

If you’ve ever worked in retail or ecommerce, you know that Black Friday and Cyber Monday are big deals. I’ve had clients who made 20-30% of their yearly income on these days alone. It sort of makes sense how this came about. A holiday means a day off, so people will have time for leisure activities such as shopping. It follows that days off near Christmas are an especially great opportunity to get people to shop for their upcoming gift giving. Enter the lousy marketers though, and suddenly, we skip past the whole gratitude part of Thanksgiving and go straight for the shopping.

Now look, Thanksgiving has complicated and somewhat hypocritical roots, but you can’t overlook the fact that it’s just plain nice to have an entire day dedicated to gratitude. As an American, it’s one of the things I’m most proud of about my country. However, it’s slowly being killed. Black Friday started as a day with sales for Christmas shopping. Now it’s just a nasty commercial nightmare that starts Thursday evening and ends Monday night. People leave their loved ones and their gratitude at the table, then go knock each other over to buy as much as they can for as cheaply as they can. Holiday ruined.

It isn’t just Thanksgiving though. Every holiday has become an occasion for lousy marketers to shove sales down people’s throats so that they forget about everything but shopping. This past July 4, I saw a commercial that encouraged me to “celebrate independence with independence from payments”. So yeah, don’t celebrate your country. Don’t waste time with your family or community. Don’t thank a soldier. Just buy stuff you couldn’t otherwise afford and be grateful that you have one year of deferred payments. Materialism is just what our forefathers intended, I’m sure.

Idiocracy was set 500 years in the future. Sometimes, I doubt it’ll take us that long to get there. We’re already losing sight of everything that matters. And so, dear readers, I offer you this – on your deathbed, you will remember people, not things. You’ll remember what you did and not what you bought. So take these holidays for what they really are. Make them into opportunities to strengthen and/or create new connections. Time away from work is precious, so make it worth it. You’ll be happy that you did.

Seasonal Planners – Lousy Marketers

Seasonal planners can definitely be lousy marketers. This happened to me about 5 years ago. I had gotten a gift certificate for Christmas, but when I went into the store to shop, they didn’t have sweaters, gloves, or any of the other warm clothes I needed. It was late January, it was cold and snowy out, but all they carried was summer wear. Maybe I’m just a simpleton because I don’t plan my outfits months in advance, but I’d bet I’m not the only one.

This happens when forecasters focus nationwide instead of accounting for local needs. It’s a common recurring problem for humanity actually. For example, consider the history of the Catholic church. In the early days, the bishops had more control over their local communities. As such, their churches catered to the specific needs of the local people. Different teachings were emphasized based on the unique needs of the community. Then, as transportation and communication improved, the pope was able to enforce more control and establish standard dogmas across all territories. The power of the local bishops decreased and with that, the emphasis on the unique needs of the community decreased as well. When you try to apply one size fits all, you push people to the fringes. That’s how the Catholic church split into the many christian churches that are around today.

Alternatively, consider that before the industrial revolution, most clothes were tailored. One size fits all was created for mass production, not because it benefits the people. One of the cool things about the age of the internet is that we are going back to tailored clothes. Companies like Stitch Fix and Trumaker start with your measurements, then make clothes to fit you. It’s quite nice.

So what’s the takeaway? If you work in marketing or business, consider local needs and interests. Meet the needs of your customers instead of requiring that they meet yours. That’s the way of the future and any company who can’t figure it out will be out of business.

 

Music Ruiners – Lousy Marketers

Music Ruiners are a special breed of lousy marketer. I’m talking about the people who pick songs to use in commercials here. They take someone’s art and repurpose it for profit. It’s repulsive.

In case you couldn’t tell from my post containing Hoot’s Insomniac Playlist for Feeling Feels, music is a very important part of my life. It’s pretty much been my one constant companion. It makes my highs higher and my lows tolerable. So, to see music stripped of meaning and treated carelessly breaks my heart.

I discovered The Velvet Underground my sophomore year of college and it was love at first listen. I loved their sound, their lyrics, their content, their vibe, their fascinating history – all of it. One of my favorite songs of theirs is Heroin. Yes, it is about heroin. It isn’t advocating for the use of heroin, but it isn’t really speaking out against it either. As far as I understand it, it’s just about a person who chooses to do heroin. The lyrics describe why he uses and how it feels. Throughout the entire song, there is a drum that mimics a heartbeat. When Lou Reed sings about taking the drug, that beat quickens along with the pace of the song until you feel like your own heart might explode. And then the pulse slows again as he comes down from his high. I highly recommend you give Heroin a listen. Like it or not, you’ll respect it. It is truly an experience and I’m amazed by it every time I hear it.

And so, imagine my frustration when I heard this song that I love used as background music in a car commercial. There are layers upon layers to appreciate in Heroin, but they stripped it down to only the guitar and one line. The line they used was “I have made a big decision”. Some idiot heard that and thought to him/herself, “great, buying a car is a big decision, so this is totally appropriate”. If you know the song though, you know that the complete line is “I have made a big decision, I’m gonna try to nullify my life”. Not quite the same is it? Kind of dark, isn’t it? Kind of grossly inappropriate to use to sell SUVs, isn’t it? What a shame.

The exception to Music Ruiners is Volkswagen. In the 90’s, Volkswagen ran a series of commercials that celebrated the wonderful connection between music and driving. They picked excellent music and focused the commercials more on the euphoric feeling of driving while listening to a great song than on the car itself. I’m a bit embarrassed to admit it, but that’s how I first heard about Nick Drake, who is another of my favorite musicians. Volkswagen succeeded because they celebrated the music and the experience of listening instead of using a song out of context and stripping it of its meaning because it has a catchy melody.

Nietzsche observed that without music, life would be a mistake. He wrote that “The musical art often speaks in sounds more penetrating than the words of poetry, and takes hold of the most hidden crevices of the heart”. I couldn’t agree more. And so marketers, let’s leave the sacred alone, ok?

Obfuscators – Lousy Marketers

Obfuscators may be the worst marketers ever. I’ve noticed that post-9/11, the US government seems to love trying to pass controversial legislation by tacking on the word “freedom”. It’s been so overused that it’s been rendered almost meaningless if not ominous. That’s also true in this case.

When I first heard about “restoring internet freedom”, based on the name, I assumed it meant ensuring internet equality and access. I assumed it meant defending net neutrality. I was wrong. Freedom in this case refers to the freedom of internet service providers to control content and speed of delivery based on their preferences.

This is a real thing, they’re trying to pass it soon, and from everything I’ve researched, I think it would be very bad for most of us. This actually concerns me enough that I’ve decided to dedicate today’s post to net neutrality. See below for an explanation of what it is, arguments for it, arguments against it, my opinion, and what you can do about it. I’m trying to keep this simple and straightforward, but please see references below for sources that both support and oppose this issue.

What Is Net Neutrality?

The Wikipedia entry for net neutrality explains it better than I ever could, so here is how they define it. They state that “Net neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers and governments regulating most of the Internet must treat all data on the Internet the same, and not discriminate or charge differentially by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or method of communication. For instance, under these principles, internet service providers are unable to intentionally block, slow down or charge money for specific websites and online content.”

Also, the show Last Week Tonight did two pretty thorough reviews of this, so please also see both Part 1 and Part 2 if you want to learn more.

 What Is Restoring Internet Freedom?

Internet service providers (ISPs) have unsuccessfully tried to get rid of net neutrality several times in the past few years. Under the Obama administration, net neutrality was protected. Under the Trump administration however, it’s in trouble again.

The new chairman of the FCC, Ajit Pai, is a former lawyer for Verizon. Like most Republicans, he is pro-free market. As such, one of his first orders of business was to try to destroy net neutrality. He refers to this as restoring internet freedom and under the current Republican majority, he may succeed.

What Is The Basic Argument For Net Neutrality?

The main argument here is essentially that the internet should be regulated like a utility. All content should be treated and delivered equally, and ISPs should not have the ability to censor or favor any content above others.

As a simple example to illustrate this, consider the following: say Comcast were to create its own video streaming service. Without net neutrality, they would be able to slow down other video streaming services such as Netflix or Hulu and speed up their own service, thereby frustrating customers into switching, and growing their own business. Worst-case scenario, they would be able to outright block their competitors or charge them more to have their services streamed faster.

Who Favors Net Neutrality?

Pretty much everyone. In terms of businesses, see here for a larger list of companies that participated in the net neutrality day of action on 7/12/17. For those with limited time, that list includes Google, Facebook, Amazon, Reddit, Twitter, Netflix, Imgur, and of course, the ACLU.

What Is The Basic Argument Against Net Neutrality?

The main argument against net neutrality is grounded in the idea of the free market. If ISPs are not regulated, they will be more in competition with one another, so if an ISP fails to satisfy customers, those customers can simply switch to another ISP. ISPs argue that regulating the internet decentivizes them from being innovative, creating more infrastructure, and providing better service.

As a simple example to illustrate this, consider the following: say Comcast did start blocking content or throttling speeds to favor content they prefer, customers would get irritated and simply switch to AT&T or another ISP. The ability for customers to decide which ISP they prefer would force greater competition and create better service overall.

Who Opposes Net Neutrality?

Internet services providers. Duh.

What Do I Think About This?

As I wrote above, I am strongly in favor of net neutrality. I’m sympathetic to the idea of free market in some instances, but I think we have become so dependent on the internet as a culture, that the government should be regulating this. Breaking net neutrality would give too much power to ISPs. I’m not just worried about streaming video services, I’m worried about information on the whole. I’m worried about throttled news sources and dissenting opinions. In short, I think the internet ought to be treated as a utility.

Did you know that the US is ranked 9th globally in terms of internet speed, but we pay more for internet service than a lot of other countries? Most areas of the US have only a handful of internet providers. Where I live in Chicago for example, there are really only 3-4 choices. However, like a lot of buildings in my area, my building is only wired for 1. So where’s the competition there? Even if I had more choices, most ISPs offer about the same service for about the same cost. I don’t want to go as far as implying collusion, but I will go as far as to say that in industries where there are only a few competitors, your business typically ends up being at parity with your competitors. Why invest in innovation and customer service when know your competitors won’t? Why not just maintain your current state and keep your profits?

In short, I don’t think I would be as spooked by this if there was more competition among ISPs, but there isn’t. The current government puts business ahead of people claiming that as business grows, the people will benefit. I just don’t think that’s true. I don’t think people will benefit from restoring internet freedom. I think government should protect and serve the people first and foremost, so regulation here is appropriate. I’m tired of the billionaires winning while us regular folks get screwed.

What Can You Do About This?

If this concerns you, call your representatives. You can find them here. Or, if you’re like me and you don’t have time to call, you can find your House Representative’s email address here and your Senators’ email addresses here. You can also register with Google’s protest here.

Other References

Save the Internet – https://www.savetheinternet.com/net-neutrality-what-you-need-know-now

Battle for the Net – https://www.battleforthenet.com/

Forbes – “Am I The Only Techie Against Net Neutrality?”, Josh Steimle, 5/14/14. https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshsteimle/2014/05/14/am-i-the-only-techie-against-net-neutrality/

Washington Post – “What to know about the FCC’s plan to undo it’s net neutrality rules”, Brian Fung, 11/20/17. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/11/20/what-to-know-about-the-fccs-upcoming-plan-to-undo-its-net-neutrality-rules/?utm_term=.1a11ad04990d